Dangote turns to Nigerian agriculture - African Business Magazine
Close
Dangote turns to Nigerian agriculture

Dangote turns to Nigerian agriculture

Nigeria’s biggest private sector company, the Dangote Group, has decided to turn its attention to agribusiness by investing heavily in sugar and rice production.

The firm is already active in food processing but has now decided to make the sector a key part of its overall business strategy. The sheer scale of its investment, coupled with renewed government interest in food production and difficulties over financing food imports, suggest that the tide may be turning in favour of Nigerian agriculture.

The Dangote Group is to invest $3.8bn in rice and sugar over the next three years. It aims to increase its sugar production of 100,000 tons a year at present to 1.5m tons a year by 2020, a rapid rise by any standards.

It also plans to grow and market 1m tons a year of rice by the same date. Edwin Devakumar, Dangote Group executive director, said: “All raw sugar has to be imported today, same thing for flour milling.” The company is also considering investing in soya beans, palm oil and corn.

Dangote has spun its cement operations into a separate firm that is now the biggest listed company in Africa outside South Africa and Morocco. It plans to do the same thing with its rice subsidiary, Dangote Rice, although the timing of the listing has not yet been determined.

Dangote Rice is to secure contracts with farmers on 200,000 hectares of land for rice cultivation and is to build 10 rice mills in the north of the country. The farmers with which it works will be supplied with fertilisers, seeds and pesticides.

The group also plans to achieve sugar cane cultivation on 350,000 hectares, with five mills. A lot of the land will be directly owned. One of the five mills will be developed on the long delayed Lau Sugar Company project in Taraba state.

Dangote will pay the state government N1.2bn ($3.7m) for 16,000 hectares of land and give it an equity stake in the company. In June, Dangote signed an agreement with Nasarawa state government to develop a N217bn ($700m) sugar project in Tunga, incorporating two sugar plants and up to 100,000 hectares of cultivation.

The scheme will have production capacity of 430,000 tonnes a year, making it by far the biggest sugar project in the country. Dangote’s interest in greatly increasing domestic cultivation of basic foodstuffs is good news on two counts.

Firstly, the company has a track record of success. It has managed to rapidly increase Nigerian cement production and has now opened cement plants in the rest of Africa.

And secondly, the fact that Dangote sees Nigerian agriculture and food processing as ideal investment opportunities suggests that the sector has great potential. Nigeria was a significant food exporter until the 1960s but has gradually become more reliant on food imports, including of staple crops that could easily be grown locally.

The country’s agricultural heritage was largely overlooked once the oil boom took off. Successive governments have pledged to reinvigorate domestic production with little success, so only time will tell whether the administration of President Muhammadu Buhari can fulfil its pledges on food production.

However, the country’s current economic woes are providing an ideal opportunity for investing in Nigerian agribusiness. The lack of access to foreign currency, including the Central Bank of Nigeria’s restrictions on providing foreign currency to pay for imports, is making it more difficult to finance food imports.

Import substitution is usually discussed in the context of manufactured goods but it is a talking point in Nigeria even with regard to staple foodstuffs. The government has retained the previous administration’s Sugar Master Plan (SMP) to make the country self-sufficient in sugar production.

It aims to boost output from 70,000 tonnes a year in 2013 to 1.7m tonnes a year by 2023, while creating 117,000 jobs. Nigerian sugar imports cost $550m in 2015. Aside from Dangote, two other companies – Golden Sugar and BUA Group – both also have ambitious plans. The former aims to boost output on its Sunti Estate to 100,000 tonnes a year, while the latter is developing its own 20,000 hectare plantation.

Rice challenges

The minister of agriculture and rural development, Audu Ogbeh, claimed in July that the country would be self-sufficient in rice production by November. In a passionate speech, he called on Nigerians to opt for Nigerian products rather than always thinking that imports are better.

He said: “We are a country that has a penchant for importation without exporting anything… We import champagne, cookies, toilet paper and even toothpicks. We have this taste for foreign products. This is killing us; it is killing our economy.”

This seems very ambitious, given that Nigeria imported 2.3m tonnes of the 5.2m tonnes of rice it consumed in 2016, making it the second biggest grain importer in the world, after China. There have been problems over land acquisition for new projects and so the government’s June review of its rice strategy concluded that there had been insufficient private sector investment in the rice sector.

In addition, industry bodies have called for a programme of support from the Nigeria Agricultural Insurance Corporation to help balance out revenue from the extreme fluctuations in rainfall patterns that have affected production. While some crops are usually grown on large plantations, rice – like cocoa – is often produced by small-scale farmers, so boosting domestic production has the potential to support thousands of small-scale rural businesses.

However, such small producers often lack the financial resilience to cope with extreme weather. The kind of agricultural insurance provided on mobile telecoms platforms in East Africa has yet to take off in West Africa.

The government and a wide range of external organisations are trying to boost yields through training programmes to demonstrate the most efficient techniques. For example, the Partnership for Sustainable Rice Systems Development in sub-Saharan Africa and the Africa Rice Centre are working with 300 farmers in six states to develop demonstration plots. In particular, they are keen to show other farmers the best options for rain-fed rice cultivation.

Neil Ford

  • odey oyama

    With deep concern, I have read through the article published by Neil Ford on the matter pertaining to the acquisition of large expanse of land for DONGOTE’S Agro-allied enterprises in Nigeria. In particular, my attention has been drawn to the following statements:
    “The group also plans to achieve sugar cane cultivation on 350,000 hectares, with five mills. A lot of the land will be directly owned.” (Paragraph 6, line 1 & 2).
    “Dangote will pay the state government N1.2bn ($3.7m) for 16,000 hectares of land and give it an equity stake in the company. In June, Dangote signed an agreement with Nasarawa state government to develop a N217bn ($700m) sugar project in Tunga, incorporating two sugar plants and up to 100,000 hectares of cultivation.” (Paragraph 7, lines 1-5)

    My understanding of these statements is that, government is acquiring lands from landlord communities and selling same to DANGOTE to establish his personal and private agricultural enterprises. My position in this specific matter is that this method of land acquisition is in contradistinction to the relevant provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, as well as the Land Use Act No. 6 of 1978. While the constitution vest sovereignty (including ownership of Land) on the landlord communities, the Land Use Act vest trusteeship on the state government. The impression given here is that Government owns land and therefore can sell it to private investors like Dangote without recourse to the communities that ancestrally own the land. The law is trite, that government can only acquire land for overriding public interest and not for purposes of reallocating same to private investors. The prompting questions here are that:
    i) Whether the Nasarawa state government in revoking communal lands and allocate same lands to DANGOTE for his personal and private use, did not act outside their powers, authority and the premise of the law?
    ii) Whether such actions of the Nasarawa state government does not violate the constitutional right of the communities (that originally own the lands) as enshrined in the 1999 Constitution as amended?
    iii)Whether the Governor of Nasarawa State exercised his constitutional power and authority in the spirit and manner expected of him as a trustee of the State in Land Management in the public interest and in compliance with the intent and provisions of the Land Use Act itself.

    My observations about the acquisition of (350,000 hectares, 16,000 hectares and 100,000 hectares) land by the Nasarawa state government for Dangote are as follows:

    a) That it is doubtful if the acquisition of ancestral lands belonging to Nasarawa communities for the use of a private developer (Dangote) is consistent with the relevant provisions of the Land Use Act No. 6 of 1978 (Laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria);

    b) It is equally doubtful if there is any Agreement entered into between Dangote and the Landlord communities over the operations on their land.

    It should be noted that the relevant provisions of the Land Use Act clearly stipulates that the Governor is the Trustee, and nothing more. He holds land on behalf of communities /owners and acts according to the trust bestowed on him, in good faith and for the benefit of the communities/owners, as prescribed by the Act. In LAW, this means that, the Governor is the manager of another person’s (Community’s) property: i.e. somebody who is given the legal authority to manage land on behalf of somebody else. In the instant case, the Nasarawa Communities. Therefore the onus is on both the Nasarawa State government and Dangote to show proof of authentic and legitimate instruments that confers rights to these lands to Dangote and/or government. In Neil Ford’s article, we have only been told of how much Dangote will be paying and /or have already paid to the Nasarawa State government for the land. This information has elicited the following curious questions about the acquisition of these very expansive land allocated to Dangote for his agricultural business in Nigeria:
    a) When was this land acquired?
    b) When and where were the notices of revocation published?
    c) When was the revocation of occupancy published?
    d) When were the compensations compiled, paid and by whom? And
    e) In what form are the interest of the landlord communities protected in this negotiations?

    Without the above subjects of proof, we are witnessing a scenario where the poor community people of Nasarawa State are being disposed of their ancestral lands and legal entitlements for the benefit of DANGOTE.

  • Dr Hakim

    This shouĺd have been the priority of every newly independent country. Nothing suceeds like success

Related Posts

Join our mailing list

If you would like Independent, Informative and Invaluable news analysis on the African continent, delivered straight to your inbox, join our mailing list.

Help us deliver better content